As more DTx-drug combinations emerge, regulation is becoming increasingly important. New models are emerging, and there is uncertainty and confusion around what label claims DTx and Pharma companies should make for their combined therapies. The approach remains open to interpretation depending on the type of combination, therapeutic area, and geography. In this meeting we want to focus on a key question: what label claims can companies make about their DTx-drug combinations? More specifically, we will discuss the following questions:
What type of label claims can DTx-drug combinations make? How does this depend on the therapeutic area?
When you have a claim associated with the drug + DTx combination, should it go through the regulatory process by default? Can these combinations bypass new regulatory processes to commercialize the combination?
In a drug + DTx combination, should both pharma and DTx change their products' claims? Should they work on new combined claims? Or should they stay the same?
What claims will make a DTx-Drug combo more effective in adoption and promotion?
Label claims cannot be universal for one solution due to regulation differences across regions. How can pharma and DTx companies deal with this when it comes to a drug+DTx regulation?