What are the thresholds of evidence, both clinical and economic, required by digital products operating in the RPM space? Do these thresholds vary by region/ jurisdiction, by clinical/ therapy area of operation, by stakeholder (hospital, payer, pharma, etc)? A survey from 2020 suggested that 55 to 58% of the European physicians believe that Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) will play a key role in the future of care. But in order to successfully gain adoption, we need to understand the above. Join to have an informal conversation with other thought leaders on:
Clinical outcomes: level of evidence needed, challenges to build meaningful and trustworthy clinical evidence, best practices and real examples.
Economic outcomes: how health systems and payers can leverage RPM solutions for disease prevention and management to ultimately reduce healthcare costs, and challenges digital health companies face to generate relevant evidence.